AgencyPin Review 2026

Talent and model agency software with booking-linked accounting

8.2 /10

Pricing

€100/month. Per user, all features, 500GB storage. Volume discounts are quoted from 5 users

Overview

AgencyPin is talent and model agency software that links booking calendars to invoices, talent fees, commissions, and statements. Once a booking is confirmed, the finance tab attaches invoice details, billing addresses, and fee lines directly to the job—those totals then flow into talent and mother agency statements without re-keying data. The platform supports multi-office agencies with centralized data and handles talent profiles, packages with branded client selection links, and reporting. Pricing starts at €100 per user per month with volume discounts for 5+ users. Free migration is available for agencies signing 6+ month agreements. AgencyPin serves 19 agencies including Select Model Management.

Verdict

AgencyPin is built for agencies that need booking and accounting to stay attached—if your finance team reconciles invoices against calendar entries by hand, this removes that step. The multi-office support and QuickBooks integration suit agency networks and growing operations. At €100/user it costs the same as Mediaslide's Agency plan but with less polish and fewer public details (no live demo, pricing requires contact). Best for multi-office talent or model agencies already using QuickBooks Online and needing 5+ users (where volume pricing kicks in). Smaller agencies or those wanting transparent pricing and migration demos should start with Mediaslide or Frava.

Strengths

  • Connects booking calendar directly to invoices, fees, and statements
  • Multi-office support for agency networks
  • E-signature for booking confirmations and contracts
  • QuickBooks Online integration for accounting sync
  • 500GB storage included for images and videos
  • Free onboarding and migration for 6+ month contracts

Weaknesses

  • Higher base price (€100/user vs. Frava's €49)
  • Volume pricing details not publicly transparent
  • Web-based talent portal instead of native mobile app
  • Less detailed public documentation compared to competitors

Best For

Multi-office model and talent agencies needing booking-to-accounting workflows with QuickBooks integration